Back to
Environment
Index
SEQUOIAS NOT REDWOODS
by
Joe Rogaly
You do suspect that mankind will eventully destroy the planet, do you not? If so, you will be among those deep greens who, like me, do not accept that the recent Tory party leadership election between John Major and John Redwood matters all that much. Saving the globe is of much greater concern than saving John Major.
Last week was more heartening. For a moment, the concerns of the earth moved us. I clapped when the TV man said that Greenpeace had won. The Brent Spar, ostensibly a redundant oil rig, but in reality a symbol of rampant industrialisation, would not be dumped in the deep ocean. Shell UK had been forced to change its mind. The British Government was irrelevant. Who could forbear to cheer?
Not everyone, it seems, if you read the subsequent comments. Sinking the steel and concrete monstrisoty would be the "best practical environmental option" according to 20 -- or was it 30? -- so-called independent scientific reports cited by Tim Eggar, Britain's Minister for Expostulation at Shell's Behaviour. Let us accept Mr Eggar's summary, while noting that by some happy coincidence the favoured option is by far the cheapest. We tree-huggers must also acknowledge that breaking up the Brent Spar and disposing of its toxic contents on land will not be a clean or simple affair. Also, if wind and waves destroy it while it is parked in a fjord awaiting an appointment at a knacker's yard, the consequent spillage would be severely destructive of marine life. Let us also take as read that the many accusation that the Greenpeace campaigners and their hanges-on, wildly exaggerated the environmental damage done by deep-sea disposal. We green Cassandras should go further. We should grant that the scientific and economic arguments in this case are, at best, finely balanced.
Why then, that feeling of elation at the Greenpeace victory? Settle down. I am about to tell you. Some of us fear that further industrial development, particularly in India and China, will so clog up the atmosphere that, in a century or two, global warming be the least of our problems. We dispute the poposition that the ability of capitalism to create ever higher mountains ofgf material goods will be of lasting benefit to the human race. We prefer giant Redwoods to John Redwood.
From the Financial Times, 1 July 1995